Communication openness, conflict events and reactions to conflict in culturally diverse workgroups

Author:

Ayoko Oluremi B.

Abstract

PurposeThis research paper aims to advance the understanding of the circumstances under which diversity may be beneficial or detrimental for quality group process. Especially, the paper seeks to argue that communication openness is antecedent to the differing group members’ reactions to conflict events, which, in turn, are proposed to impact group's task and social outcomes in culturally diverse workgroups (CDWs).Design/methodology/approachUsing social identity theory as the springboard, we built on existing literature to hypothesize the proposed relationships among variables. These relationships were tested quantitatively using multiple regression.FindingsThere are a couple of significant findings from the current research. Direct effects include groups with low levels of communication openness were linked with increased destructive reactions to conflict, bullying behaviors and emotional reactions to bullying; and destructive reactions to conflict were associated with emotional reactions to bullying. Moderating effects include: high levels of communication openness moderated high levels of productive reactions to conflict for decreased bullying behaviors in groups; communication openness made a difference on bullying when destructive reactions to conflict higher; and lower levels of communication openness moderated destructive reactions for increased emotional reactions to bullying.Research limitations/implicationsThis study is limited by its reliance on data that focused on primarily on cultural diversity consequently, the impact of gender, age, and other forms of diversity has not been controlled. Future research should consider the impact of age and other forms of diversity in teasing out the effect of communication openness on bullying behaviors.Practical implicationsThe results from this study have implications for leaders of CDWs. A leader who is able to manage the reactions to conflict, especially destructive reactions to conflict by increasing communication openness may be able to reduce the perception of bullying behaviors and emotional reactions to bullying. These actions should, in turn, lead to increased group task outcomes.Originality/valueFirst, this current paper is one of the first few studies that quantitatively examined bullying in organizational workgroups and in particular, culturally heterogeneous workgroups. Secondly, the paper is also one of the first few papers to examine the role of communication openness and reactions to conflict in workplace bullying and emotional reactions to bullying. Consequently, the paper will be useful for group members and managers as well as leaders of workgroups that experience conflict and bullying. Specifically, such leaders will need not only to manage conflict skillfully but also manage the group member's reaction to conflict to reduce bullying and emotions of bullying in their workgroups.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies

Reference91 articles.

1. Abrams, D., Thomas, J. and Hogg, M. (1990), “Numerical distinctiveness, social identity, and gender salience”, British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 29, pp. 87‐92.

2. Alder, N.J. (1991), International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, 2nd ed., PWS‐Kent Publishing Company, Boston, MA.

3. Amason, A.C. (1996), “Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision‐making: resolving a paradox for top management teams”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, pp. 123‐48.

4. Amason, A.C. and Schweiger, D.M. (1994), “Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making and organizational performance”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 5, pp. 239‐54.

5. Ayoko, O.B. and Härtel, C.E.J. (2002), “The role of emotion and emotion management in destructive and productive conflict in culturally heterogeneous workgroups”, in Ashkanasy, N.M., Härtel, C.E.J. and Zerbe, W.J. (Eds), Managing Emotions in the Workplace M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, pp. 77‐97.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3