Author:
Milazzo Maria Francesca,Spina Francesco
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to quantify the human health impacts of soy-biodiesel production with the aim to discuss about its environmental sustainability.
Design/methodology/approach
– The integrated use of two current approaches, risk assessment (RA) and life cycle assessment (LCA), has allowed improvement of the potentialities of both in obtaining a more complete analysis. The implementation of a life cycle indicator for the assessment of the impacts on the human health, integrating the features of both approaches, is the main focus of this paper.
Findings
– It has been found that, although the biodiesel is a green fuel, it has some criticalities in its life cycle, which cannot be disregarded. In fact, even if biodiesel is essentially a clean fuel there are some phases, prior to the industrial phase, that can cause negative effects on human health and ecosystems.
Practical implications
– Results suggest some measures which can be adopted to substantially reduce human health impacts. Further alternative could be analysed in future to gain more insight about the use of biodiesel fuels.
Originality/value
– The estimation of the impacts of a process producing biodiesel has been made by using a novel approach. The novelty is associated with the calculation of the impacts on human health by using the transfer factors applied in RA. The use of such factors, properly modified in order to estimate the impacts on a wider scale than a site-dimension, allows defining a holistic approach, as LCA and RA are used as complete units but at the same time can be related to each other.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference30 articles.
1. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
(1995), “Standard guide for risk based corrective action applied at petroleum release sites”, Document No. E-1739-95, West Conshohocken.
2. APAT
(2008),
Criteri metodologici per l’applicazione dell’analisi assoluta di rischio ai siti contaminate, Guidelines
, APAT (in Italian).
3. Bare, J.C.
,
Norris, G.A.
,
Pennington, D.W.
and
McKone, T.
(2002), “TRACI the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts”,
Journal of Industrial Ecology
, Vol. 6 Nos 3/4, pp. 49-78.
4. Cowell, S.J.
,
Fairman, R.
and
Lofstedt, R.E.
(2002), “Use of risk assessment and life cycle assessment in decision making: a common policy research agenda”,
Risk Analysis
, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 879-894.
5. Fabiano, B.
,
Reverberi, A.P.
,
Del Borghi, A.
and
Dovi, V.G.
(2012), “Biodiesel production via transesterification: process safety insights from kinetic modelling”,
Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering
, Vol. 46 No. 6, pp. 673-680.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献