A critical review of work values: a bibliometric analysis

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to empirically examine the research related to work values published in the two major databases Scopus and Web of Science. Design/methodology/approach This paper opted for a bibliometric study using the R (Bibliometric R package). The bibliometric analysis was conducted on 498 papers after removing duplicates published between 1964 and 2022. Findings This study finds that the number of articles and citations is limited but growing. Journal of Applied Psychology was regarded as the most influential journal with maximum citations. Maximum citations and publications came from the USA. The study revealed that maximum collaborations were done between authors located in the USA and China. Research limitations/implications The researcher used only two databases in the study, so papers included in other databases are left, which can affect the study results. Practical implications This research may be beneficial for both human resource practitioners and researchers because it identifies the research gaps and future research needs in the field of work values. Besides, this paper will help the researchers to understand the publishing trends in the subject area. Originality/value This research incorporates bibliometric analysis for a critical analysis of Work Value literature. This research contributes to the existing literature and assists fellow researchers in future studies.