Forcing German managers to focus on productivity

Author:

Klikauer Thomas

Abstract

PurposeAims to test Walton and McKersie’s theory on labour negotiations, specifically in the case of German car manufacturers.Design/methodology/approachThe research is based on interviews with industrial actors in Germany’s car industry – an empirical case study.FindingsThe article explains the structural force behind the managerial drive towards production. While German managers act at an enterprise level, a structural force has been responsible for the success of Germany’s post‐WW II manufacturing. Germany’s collective bargaining structure removed wage and working‐time bargaining from local management and opened four managerial options: production, productivity, innovation, and quality. This structure forced management to focus on these four options because they lie within the realm of management prerogative. The article explains how structural divisions between intra‐enterprise level arrangements and extra‐enterprise level collective bargaining at a conceptual level can best be understood.Originality/valueArgues that a regional and industry collective bargaining structure has supported the success of a competitive car industry in Germany.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations

Reference74 articles.

1. Ackers, P. and Wilkinson, A. (2003), Understanding Work and Employment – Industrial Relations in Transition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

2. Bahnmüller, R. and Bispinck, R. (Eds.) (2003), “Tarifpolitik in Deutschland – special issue on collective bargaining in Germany”, Industielle Beziehungen, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 189‐335.

3. Behrens, M., Fichter, M. and Frege, C. (2002), “Unions in Germany: grouping to regain the initiative”, ILO Discussion Paper, DP/131/2002, ILO, Geneva.

4. Bispinck, R. (2002a), Informationen zur Tarifpolitik‐Tarifbericht 2002, Düsseldorf: WSI

5. Bispinck, R. (2002b), Collective Bargaining in Germany, available at: www.boeckler.de/wsi/tarchiv/aktuell/(accessed 17 December 2004).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3