The role of social identity in doctors' experiences of clinical managing

Author:

Hallier Jerry,Forbes Tom

Abstract

PurposeAims to illustrate how the use of a social identity approach can help to refine our understanding of how organizational professionals experience the introduction of managerialism and the incorporation of managing specialist roles.Design/methodology/approachDraws on theories of social identity and social categorization to examine the process by which clinical directors tackle and assign meaning to their managing roles. Interviews were conducted with a sample of current and previous clinical directors over a five year period. Variations in doctors’ responses were explained by a range of self enhancement strategies that emerged to deal with tensions between prepared management identities and actual role experiences.FindingsReveals the importance of multiple self‐enhancement strategies as a way for doctors to protect self definitions in failing identity situations where immediate exit from a new role is not feasible. Concludes that a greater use of social identity and social categorization theory may add much to general explanations of how varied stances towards management interventions emerge and develop among professional workers.Originality/valuePoints to how we might achieve a deeper understanding of the diverse ways that the organizational professionals experience the introduction of managerialism and the incorporation of managing the specialist roles.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations

Reference52 articles.

1. Ackroyd, S. (1994), “Professions, their organisation and change in Britain: some private and public sector similarities and their consequences”, paper presented to ESRC series on Professions in Late Modernity, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, 30 June.

2. Bornman, E. and Mynhardt, J. (1992), “Social identity and intergroup contact with specific reference to the work situation”, Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, Vol. 117, pp. 439‐62.

3. Branscombe, N. and Wann, D. (1994), “Collective self‐esteem consequences of out‐group derogation when valued social identity is on trial”, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 641‐58.

4. Bruce, A. and Hill, S. (1994), “Relationships between doctors and managers: the Scottish experience”, Journal of Management in Medicine, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 49‐57.

5. Burgoyne, J. and Lorbiecki, A. (1993), “Clinicians into management: the experience in context”, Health Services Management Research, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 248‐59.

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3