The OHS regulatory challenges posed by agency workers: evidence from Australia

Author:

Johnstone Richard,Quinlan Michael

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this research is to analyse the problems for occupational health and safety (OHS) regulators posed by agency work/leased labour (also known as labour hire in Australasia), using Australian evidence.Design/methodology/approachThe analysis is based on an examination of prosecutions involving labour hire firms along with other documentary records (union, industry and government reports and guidance material). The study also draws on interviews with approximately 200 regulatory officials, employers and union representatives since 2001 and workplace visits with 40 OHS inspectors in 2004‐2005.FindingsThe triangular relationship entailed in labour leasing, in combination with the temporary nature of most placements, poses serious problems for government agencies in terms of enforcing OHS standards notwithstanding a growing number of successful prosecutions for breaches of legislative duties by host and labour leasing firms.Research limitations/implicationsResearch to investigate these issues in other countries and compare findings with those for Australia is required, along with assessing the effectiveness of new enforcement initiatives.Practical implicationsThe paper assesses existing regulatory responses and highlights the need for new regulatory strategies to combat the problems posed by labour.Originality/valueThe OHS problems posed by agency work have received comparatively little attention. The paper provides insights into the specific problems posed for OHS regulators and how inspectorates are trying to address them.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations

Reference37 articles.

1. ACTU (2000a), ACTU Comments on Recruitment and Consulting Services Association Publications, Australian Council of Trade Unions, Melbourne.

2. ACTU (2000b), OHS and Labour Hire, Australian Council of Trade Unions, Melbourne.

3. Allach, P. and Inkson, K. (2004), “The new office temp: alternative models of contingent labour”, New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 37‐52.

4. Aronsson, G. (1999), “Contingent workers and health and safety”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 439‐60.

5. Brennan, L., Valos, M. and Hindle, K. (2003), On‐hired Workers in Australia: Motivation and Outcomes, RMIT University, Melbourne.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3