Author:
Vakola Maria,Nikolaou Ioannis
Abstract
PurposeOccupational stress and organizational change are now widely accepted as two major issues in organizational life. The current study explores the linkage between employees’ attitudes towards organizational change and two of the most significant constructs in organizational behaviour; occupational stress and organizational commitment.Design/methodology/approachA total of 292 participants completed ASSET, a new “Organizational Screening Tool”, which, among other things, measures workplace stress and organizational commitment and a measure assessing attitudes towards organizational change.FindingsThe results were in the expected direction showing negative correlations between occupational stressors and attitudes to change, indicating that highly stressed individuals demonstrate decreased commitment and increased reluctance to accept organizational change interventions. The most significant impact on attitudes to change was coming from bad work relationships emphasizing the importance of that occupational stressor on employees’ attitudes towards change. The results did not support the role of organizational commitment as a moderator in the relationship between occupational stress and attitudes to change.Research limitations/implicationsA limitation of the research design could be that all measures originated from the same source resulting in possible contamination from common method variance. Further, the cross‐sectional research design adopted in the present study, as opposed to a longitudinal or experimental methodology, does not allow affirmative causal explanations.Originality/valueThe present study showed that good and effective work relationships are very important in organizational change. Handling conflicts, building supportive work relationships and communicating effectively all contribute to the formulation of positive attitudes to change and, therefore, to the success of a change programme. In addition, organizations need to examine the extra workload which organizational change may create. Increase in workload is not only easily attributable to the change but it also makes change unattractive and problematic leading to non‐supportive attitudes.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference63 articles.
1. Armenakis, A. and Bedeian, A. (1999), “Organisational change: a review of theory and research in the 1990 s”, Journal of Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 293‐315.
2. Armenakis, A.A., Harris, S.G. and Mossholder, K.W. (1993), “Creating readiness for organizational change”, Human Relations, Vol. 46 No. 6, pp. 681‐702.
3. Arnold, J., Cooper, C. and Robertson, I.T. (1995), Work Psychology: Understanding Human Behaviour in the Workplace, Pitman Publishing, London.
4. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D. (1986), “The moderator‐mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51 No. 6, pp. 1173‐82.
5. Beehr, T.A. and Franz, T.M. (1987), “The current debate about the meaning of job stress”, in Ivancevich, J.M. and Ganster, D.C. (Eds), Job Stress From Theory to Suggestion, Haworth Press, New York, NY, pp. 5‐18.
Cited by
223 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献