Author:
Forde Chris,MacKenzie Robert,Robinson Andrew
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the dynamics between employers' use of temporary agency workers and the aspirations of agencies to expand their role further within organisations.Design/methodology/approachThe study focuses on the construction sector in the UK. A mixed methods approach is employed comprising a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews with construction employers.FindingsConstruction employers' use of temporary agency workers remains driven by “traditional” reasons, to meet short‐term peaks in demand and for one‐off tasks. Construction employers have widespread reservations about the use of temporary agency workers. There is little evidence of an expansion in the range of tasks or managerial functions being performed by agencies in construction. Together, these findings point to limits to the inexorable expansion of temporary agencies in the sector.Research limitations/implicationsFurther research is needed to assess the extent to which these reservations surrounding agencies, and the limits on the expansion of agencies that these reservations imply, are applicable to sectors outside construction.Practical implicationsEmployers' lack of appetite for agency workers stem from perceived problems of quality of agency labour and a desire to maintain control over production. These reservations suggest that agency aspirations to increase their role and functions further in the construction sector are likely to be frustrated.Originality/valueMuch research has pointed to the growth of agency working in recent years. The principal value of this research is in highlighting the potential limits to the inexorable expansion of agency working. The paper also reveals employers' reservations towards agencies, which have been neglected in the literature to date.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference39 articles.
1. Adnett, N. and Hardy, S. (2001), “Reviewing the working time directive: rationale, implementation and case law”, Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 114‐25.
2. Autor, D. (2001), “Why do temporary help firms provide free general skills training?”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116 No. 4, pp. 1409‐48.
3. Bergström, O. (2003), “Beyond atypicality”, in Bergström, O. and Storrie, D. (Eds), Contingent Employment in Europe and the US, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
4. Biggs, D. and Swailes, S. (2006), “Relations, commitment and satisfaction in agency workers and permanent workers”, Employee Relations, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 130‐43.
5. CIETT (2000), Orchestrating the Evolution of Private Employment Agencies Towards a Stronger Society, Confederation Internationale des Entreprises de Travail Temporaire, Brussels.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献