Author:
Roten Yonathan Silvain,Vanheems Régine
Abstract
Purpose
Increasingly, consumers shopping online are not doing so alone. This paper aims to identify motivations for and barriers to shopping together with relatives or friends on the same screen.
Design/methodology/approach
This study proposes an interdisciplinary theoretical framework investigating “sharing” and related commercial practices. It adopts an exploratory qualitative methodology as the phenomenon of screen sharing has not been widely investigated in prior consumer behavior literature.
Findings
Social and utilitarian motives elicit joint shopping in stores and collaborative consumption. This study reveals a third motive, related to the need for control, that drives shopping on the same screen. Screen sharing can increase efficiency, social bonds and control, due to the transparent presentation of information on the screen, but it also can cause inefficiency, social tension and struggle for control over the device.
Research limitations/implications
Screen-sharing motives reflect different logics for sharing: distribution (use with), communication (discuss with) and collaboration (control with). Defining further antecedents and consequences of joint shopping on the same screen represents relevant goals for further research.
Practical implications
By adapting their online platforms, brands can provide more agreeable, efficient and empowering experiences to screen-sharing shoppers, and thus gain competitive advantages.
Originality/value
Marketers generally assume online shoppers are alone at their screens, but in practice, many of them are often browsing together. Especially for families confined together at home, shopping together online constitutes a common practice.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference58 articles.
1. A phenomenological approach to the collaborative consumer;Journal of Consumer Marketing,2019
2. Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing;Journal of Consumer Research,2012
3. Why not share rather than own?;The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,2007
4. Sharing;Journal of Consumer Research,2010
5. Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in Web 2.0;The Anthropologist,2014
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献