The specificity and typology of dynamic management studies

Author:

Nicolescu Ovidiu,Nicolescu Ciprian

Abstract

Purpose – The paper aims to analyse typology of dynamic management studies and their specificity. Design/methodology/approach – The study analyses more than 200 studies published in English, French and Romanian management literature in the last 15 years. The data analysis follows a qualitative methodology. Findings – The study provides: four classifications of the dynamic managerial approach and their specificity; and the main advantages and limits of dynamic management analysis. Research limitations/implications – Further research should use the classifications, advantages and limits identified to investigate certain dynamic management analyses and formulate conclusions and recommendations for better dynamic managerial analysis. Practical implications – The paper highlights the specificity of different types of dynamic management analyses, that are often underestimated by researchers, professors, managers, students etc. The findings could be used by management practitioners to better understand the management evolution and performance of different organizations, to elaborate company strategy and policy, to change organizational culture a.s.o. Social implications – The increasement of social evaluation and prognosis quality. Originality/value – In the international management literature, the paper provides the first classification of dynamic management studies and their specificity and the synthesis of the main advantages and limits of dynamic management studies for both management theoreticians and practitioners. These elements are useful to increase the value of dynamic management studies and to improve management practices in organizations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference101 articles.

1. Abell, A. and Oxbrow, N. (2002), Competing with Knowledge, Library Association Publishing, London.

2. Acs, Y.J. and Amorós, J.E. (2008), “Entrepreneurship and competitiveness dynamics in Latin America”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 305-322.

3. Agbor, E. (2008), “Creativity and innovation: the leadership dynamics”, Journal of Strategic Leadership, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 39-45.

4. Alonderiene, R. (2010), “Enhancing informal learning to improve job satisfaction: perspective of SMEs managers in Lithuania”, Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 257-287.

5. Bold, O. (2011), “A perspective on organizational change issue – case study on the application of two change models”, Review of International Comparative Management, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 871-882.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3