Author:
Hsieh‐Yee Ingrid,Smith Michael
Abstract
This survey, conducted in late 1999, found that CORC founding libraries shared a strong interest in controlling Internet resources and finding ways to catalog such resources quickly. Many cataloged in MARC. Although only a small number of them experimented with Dublin Core, many of them wanted to explore its potential for organizing Internet resources. Other metadata schemes were also used by some libraries. Overall, the founding libraries considered their CORC experience positive, but had several concerns. Their experience suggests that more work is needed to make fast, automated cataloging a reality. Since the findings of this study reflect experience with CORC at the developmental stage, the researchers proposed that CORC usage be monitored to identify trends in organizing Internet resources. A survey of CORC subscribers could be conducted to understand usage patterns and guide CORC’s development and improvement.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Education,Information Systems
Reference26 articles.
1. Chepesiuk, R. (1999), “Organizing the Internet: the ‘core’ of the challenge”, American Libraries, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 60‐3.
2. Childress, E. (2001), “Crosswalking metadata in the OCLC CORC service”, Journal of Internet Cataloging, Vol. 4 Nos 1/2, pp. 81‐8.
3. ”CORC – Cooperative Online Resource Catalog: report of a session at the 1999 ALA Conference” (2000), Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 295‐6.
4. Edmunds, J. and Brisson, R. (2001), “Cataloging in CORC: a work in progress”, Journal of Internet Cataloging, Vol. 4 Nos 1/2, pp. 89‐109.
5. Godby, C.J. and Reighart, R. (2001), “Terminology identification in a collection of Web resources”, Journal of Internet Cataloging, Vol. 4 Nos 1/2, pp. 49‐65.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Descriptive Cataloging Proficiencies Among Beginning Students;Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning;2005-09-15
2. The electronic library: responses from the State University of New York (SUNY);OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives;2004-12-01
3. Recent Work in Cataloging and Classification, 2000–2002;Library Resources & Technical Services;2003-07-01
4. Distributing non-MARC metadata: the CUGIR metadata sharing project;Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services;2002-09