Abstract
This article characterises the questioning behaviour in reference interviews preceding delegated online searches of bibliographic databases and relates it to questioning behaviour in other types of interviews/settings. With one exception, the unit of analysis is the question (N=610), not the interview. The author uses A.C. Graesser‘s typology of questions to analyse type of question and M.D. White’s typology of information categories to determine the question‘s content objective; this is the first application of Graesser’s typology to interview questions in any setting. Graesser‘s categories allow for a more subtle understanding of the kind of information need underlying a question. Comparisons are made between questions asked by the information specialist and those asked by the client. Findings show that the information specialist dominates the interview, about half the questions were verification questions and about 22% were judgemental questions or requests; all but four types of questions from Graesser’s categories appeared in the interviews, but no new question types were discovered. Clients often phrase questions as requests. In content, both clients and information specialists focus on the subject and service requested, but the clients ask also about search strategy and output features. Both parties ask predominantly short‐answer questions. Results are related to interface design for retrieval systems.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Finding patterns in policy questions;Scientific Reports;2022-11-22
2. Question types and intermediary elicitations;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2015-05-01
3. Assessment of H1N1 questions and answers posted on the Web;American Journal of Infection Control;2012-04
4. User models as revealed in web-based research services;Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology;2011-11-15
5. On intermediaries' inquiring minds, elicitation styles, and user satisfaction;Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology;2011-09-19