Author:
Kazoleas Dean,Kim Yungwook,Anne Moffitt Mary
Abstract
Examines the concept of institutional (university) image from a cultural studies approach and from a quantitative perspective. Building on these and other research findings, posits that multiple changing images exist within each individual and that these images are affected by certain factors. Examines university image from an external stakeholder perspective, based on a telephone survey study of respondents from across the university’s home state. The results confirm multi‐image conceptualization of the university setting and, importantly, examine the factors – personal, environmental, and organizational – that give rise to the multiple image concept. Complementing much corporate image research that views image(s) as primarily controlled by the organization, these findings suggest that corporate image, considered also as a receiver‐oriented and audience‐specific construct, can vary as a function of other, external, determining factors but that organizational factors are, nevertheless, very influential factors for one’s decision making about image.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference33 articles.
1. Ackerman, L.D. (1990), “Identity in action”, IABC Communication World, pp. 33‐50.
2. Albert, S. and Whetton, D.A. (1985), “Organizational identity”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7, pp. 263‐95.
3. Albert, S., Ashforth, B.E. and Dutton, J.E. (2000), “Organizational identity and identification: charting new waters and building new bridges”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 13‐17.
4. Alvesson, M. (1990), “Organization: from substance to image?”, Organization Studies, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 373‐94.
5. Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989), “Social identity theory and the organization”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, pp. 20‐39.
Cited by
95 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献