Process validation: coping with three dilemmas in process-based single-case research

Author:

Andersen Poul Houman,Dubois Anna,Lind Frida

Abstract

Purpose Recent research suggests that the interest in process-based single-case studies is increasing in business-to-business (B2B) marketing. This paper aims to discuss research validity issues and dilemmas encountered by process-based single-case researchers in B2B marketing. Design/methodology/approach This is a methodology paper that builds on an integration of experiences, ideas and literature. Findings In the paper, three dilemmas are suggested that researchers need to deal with in process-based single-case research. These relate to the casing process: crafting the case, communicating the case and describing the process of the study. Furthermore, process validation is suggested as a research quality concept concerned with how these dilemmas are handled. Research limitations implications Based on the notion of process validation, the authors provide suggestions for how casing, as a process-based single-case approach, can be conveyed and advanced in its own right. Practical implications This study can be used to convey insights that can help new and experienced researchers in conducting single-case studies in B2B. Originality/value Coping with issues of research quality in B2B marketing is of relevance to researchers dealing with process-based single-case research and process validation issues, as well as to journal reviewers evaluating the qualities of process-based single-case research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing,Business and International Management

Reference82 articles.

1. Aberg, S. (2013), Science in Business Interaction: A Study of the Collaboration Between CERN and Swedish Companies, Doctoral dissertation, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Uppsala universitet.

2. Constructing mystery: empirical matters in theory development;Academy of Management Review,2007

3. Sense and sensibility: two approaches for using existing theory in theory-building qualitative research;Industrial Marketing Management,2010

4. Ensuring validity in qualitative international business research,2004

5. The new paradigm wars: is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities?;Educational Researcher,1999

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3