Author:
Rees Jonathan I.,Rees Christopher J.
Abstract
Highlights the fact that foreign language (FL) training is a problematic area for many companies. Outlines five approaches to FL training that can be adopted by organizations, ranging from the “language for all” approach to a highly selective approach based on job analysis and individual assessment. Points out that these approaches can be realized in part or whole by two very different implementation strategies.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Reference14 articles.
1. 1Barnham, K., “The internationalization of business and the international manager”, Industrial and Commercial Training, July/August 1987, pp. 6‐11.
2. 2“LinguaTel survey on foreign language skills”, reported inThe Independent, 8 June 1995.
3. 3Department of Trade and Industry, National Languages for Export Campaign, DTI London, 1994.
4. 4Scullard, S., The Provision of Foreign Language Training to Industry, Further Education Unit, 1989.
5. 5Ferney, D., “Language skills: is reactive training enough?”, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 14 No. 9, 1990, pp. 27‐30.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Language and the faces of power;International Journal of Cross Cultural Management;2017-01-01
2. Language and Culture Requirements in International Business Majors at AACSB‐Accredited Business Schools;Journal of Teaching in International Business;2009-12
3. Beyond English;Management Decision;2006-12
4. Business culture in Latin America: interactive learning for UK SMEs;Journal of European Industrial Training;2003-11
5. Developing Cross-Cultural Communication Skills;Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice;2002-10