Abstract
PurposeThis research analyses challenges faced by users at various levels in planning and designing participatory simulation models of cities. It aims to identify issues that hinder experts from maximising the effectiveness of the SUMO tool. Additionally, evaluating current methods highlights their strengths and weaknesses, facilitating the use of participatory simulation advantages to address these issues. Finally, the presented case studies illustrate the diversity of user groups and emphasise the need for further development of blueprints.Design/methodology/approachIn this research, action research was used to assess and improve a step-by-step guideline. The guideline's conceptual design is based on stakeholder analysis results from those involved in developing urban logistics scenarios and feedback from potential users. A two-round process of application and refinement was conducted to evaluate and enhance the guideline's initial version.FindingsThe guidelines still demand an advanced skill level in simulation modelling, rendering them less effective for the intended audience. However, they have proven beneficial in a simulation course for students, emphasising the importance of developing accurate conceptual models and the need for careful implementation.Originality/valueThis paper introduces a step-by-step guideline designed to tackle challenges in modelling urban logistics scenarios using SUMO simulation software. The guideline's effectiveness was tested and enhanced through experiments involving diverse groups of students, varying in their experience with simulation modelling. This approach demonstrates the guideline's applicability and adaptability across different skill levels.
Reference38 articles.
1. Integrating SUMO and Kalman filter models towards a social network based approach of public transport arrival time prediction;International Journal of Simulation Systems Science and Technology,2015
2. Modeling ant colony optimization for multi-agent based intelligent transportation system;International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications,2019
3. City logistics modeling efforts: trends and gaps - a review;Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,2012
4. Baalsrud Hauge, J., Ramos Carretero, M., Kodjabachian, J., Meijer, S., Raghothama, J. and Duqueroie, B. (2016), “ProtoWorld –a simulation based gaming environment to model and plan urban mobility”, in De Gloria, A. and Veltkamp, R. (Eds), Games and Learning Alliance, Springer International Publishing (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Cham, pp. 393-400.
5. Behrisch, M., Bieker, L., Erdmann, J. and Krajzewicz, D. (2011), “SUMO–simulation of urban mobility: an overview”, Proceedings of SIMUL 2011, The Third International Conference on Advances in System Simulation.