Towards a common and semantic representation of e-portfolios

Author:

Rezgui Kalthoum,Mhiri Hédia,Ghédira Khaled

Abstract

Purpose Since the early 1980s, a paradigm shift, caused by the work undertaken in the field of cognitive psychology, has occurred. This shift is known as the move from teacher-centered instruction to learner-centered or learning-centered instruction, and emphasizes the importance of building new knowledge on previous ones, interacting with peers, making meaningful and reflective learning and being engaged in his own path to foster learning. This new vision of teaching has created a need for new learning and assessment instruments that are better adapted to these pedagogical realities. In this context, the electronic portfolio or e-portfolio is one of the most versatile and effective tools that have been proposed for this purpose. More specifically, the interest in e-portfolios has grown considerably with the emergence of the competency-based approach and portfolio-based competency assessments. The purpose of this paper is to describe a semantic-based representation of e-portfolios, defined on the basis of official e-portfolio standards and specifications. Moreover, a comparative study of several well-known e-portfolio solutions has been carried out based on different facets, such as functional features, technical and organizational features. The objective is to identify those features that are mostly supported by e-portfolio solution providers and accordingly to gain a fairly accurate idea of the common structure of e-portfolios. In addition, the authors take advantage of an already implemented ontological model describing competency-related characteristics of learners and learning objects and combine it with the e-portfolio ontology, with a view to support a more reliable and authentic competency assessment. Design/methodology/approach The proposed e-portfolio ontology was built following the ontology development methodology Methontology (Fernandez et al., 1997). In addition, it was constructed using the Protégé ontology environment (Protégé, 2007) and was implemented in OWL (Web Ontology Language) (Antoniou and Harmelen, 2004). Findings The proposed e-portfolio ontology provides humans with a shared vocabulary that enables capturing the most important elements in e-portfolios and serves as the basis for the semantic interoperability for machines. Originality/value The main advantage of the e-portfolio ontology lies in its ability to provide a common and semantically enriched representation of e-portfolio artifacts, thus facilitating the interoperability and exchange of competency evidences between different learning systems and platforms. In addition, capturing the semantics of e-portfolios helps to make them utilizable by intelligent applications.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference37 articles.

1. Antoniou, G. and Harmelen, F. (2004), “Web ontology language: OWL”, in Staab, S. and Studer, R. (Eds), Handbook on Ontologies, Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 67-92.

2. Barker, K.C. (2005), “ePortfolio for the assessment of learning”, FuturEd White Paper, available at: www.futured.com/documents/FuturEdePortfolioforAssessmentWhitePaper_000.pdf (accessed November 10, 2017).

3. Barrett, H.C. (2000), “Electronic teaching portfolios: Multimedia skills + Portfolio development = Powerful professional development”, available at: http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/site2000.html (accessed November 10, 2017).

4. Barrett, H.C. (2005), “Researching electronic portfolios: learning, engagement and collaboration through technology”, technical report, available at: http://electronicportfolios.org/reflect/whitepaper.pdf (accessed December 25, 2017).

5. Brickley, D. and Miller, L. (2010), “FOAF vocabulary specification”, available at: http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/ (accessed December 20, 2017).

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The role of ePortfolios in supporting learning in eight healthcare disciplines: A scoping review;Nurse Education in Practice;2022-08

2. An enhanced online learning environment in the time of COVID-19;Informatica;2021-10-31

3. AI-Powered Decentralized Recruitment System on the Blockchain;Global Disclosure of Economics and Business;2021-08-01

4. Knowledge modeling: A survey of processes and techniques;International Journal of Intelligent Systems;2021-01-04

5. A blockchain-based smart contracts platform to competency assessment and validation;International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems;2020-03-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3