Author:
Ponomarov Serhiy Y.,Holcomb Mary C.
Abstract
PurposeIn the emerging disciplines of risk management and supply chain management, resilience is a relatively undefined concept. The purpose of this paper is to present an integrated perspective on resilience through an extensive review of the literature in a number of disciplines including developmental psychology and ecosystems. In addition, the paper identifies and addresses some of the current theoretical gaps in the existing research.Design/methodology/approachSupply chain resilience has been defined by a number of disciplines. An integrative literature review is conducted in an attempt to integrate existing perspectives. This review also serves as the basis for the development of a conceptual model.FindingsThe key elements of supply chain resilience and the relationships among them, the links between risks and implications for supply chain management, and the methodologies for managing these key issues are poorly understood. Implications for future research advocate testing the proposed model empirically.Practical implicationsSupply chain disruptions have adverse effect on both revenue and costs. Resilient supply chains incorporate event readiness, are capable of providing an efficient response, and often are capable of recovering to their original state or even better post the disruptive event.Originality/valueSupply chain resilience has yet to be researched from the logistics perspective. Even in well‐developed disciplines the unified theory of resilience is still under development. This research leverages existing knowledge and advances an interdisciplinary understanding of the concept.
Subject
Transportation,Business and International Management
Reference89 articles.
1. Barney, J. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 99‐120.
2. Blackhurst, J., Craighead, C.W., Elkins, D. and Handfield, R.B. (2005), “An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply‐chain disruptions”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 43 No. 19, pp. 4067‐81.
3. Bunderson, J.S. and Sutcliffe, K.M. (2002), “Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: process and performance effects”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, pp. 875‐93.
4. Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, M. and Abel, N. (2001), “From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?”, Ecosystems, Vol. 4, pp. 765‐81.
5. Chopra, S. and Sodhi, M.S. (2004), “Managing risk to avoid supply‐chain breakdown”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 53‐61.
Cited by
1352 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献