Abstract
PurposeThe main purpose of this paper is to examine the political, economic and institutional determinants of capital assets condition ratio in American local governments using government-wide financial statements.Design/methodology/approachBased on capital assets data from the period of 2011–2016 for the 66 Florida counties as reported on their government-wide financial statements, the authors use a panel two-way fixed effects estimation and a dynamic panel generalized method of moments estimation.FindingsThe authors find that social-economic factors, fiscal capacity and democratic voters explain the capital assets condition ratio in Florida county governments.Research limitations/implicationsThe major findings of this study may only apply to county government in one single state. It may raise the issue of the external validity of our research. It provides policy recommendations for local public officials to maintain and upgrade their capital assets.Originality/valueThe study utilizes a new approach of capital assets condition ratio to measure county government investment in capital assets based on the government-wide financial statements.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration
Reference42 articles.
1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2021), “2021 report card for America's infrastructure”, available at: https://infrastructurereportcard.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/National_IRC_2021-report.pdf.
2. What drives infrastructure spending in cities of developing countries?;Urban Studies,2005
3. The demand for municipal infrastructure projects: some evidence from Connecticut towns and cities;Public Finance Review,2015
4. Reporting of infrastructure assets by state governments;Municipal Finance Journal,2009
5. Infrastructure asset reporting and pricing uncertainty in the municipal bond market;Journal of Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting,2016