Abstract
PurposeThe goal of this exploratory study was to investigate if, when asked to state their preferences for the allocation of public monies toward broad governmental functions, individuals state them at random or if their choice follows some rational pattern that can be traced using explanatory variables.Design/methodology/approachThe paper presents the results of a survey conducted in Greece, Italy and Switzerland where the contingent allocation method was applied to a hypothetical allocation scenario of public monies to the functions of the government.FindingsFindings based on 428 answers revealed that individuals were able to state their preferences for the various functions of the government as well as discriminate between the relative utility of each task and that the country context and personal characteristics significantly influence the respondents' allocations.Originality/valueFrom a policy perspective, understanding citizen preferences in budget allocation may help governments rationalize the spending of public money.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration
Reference32 articles.
1. Report of the national oceanic and atmospheric administration (NOAA) panel on contingent valuation;Federal Register,1993
2. Equilibrium in fiscal choices: evidence from a budget game;Public Choice,1994
3. Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren't available;The Journal of Economic Perspectives,2012
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献