Author:
Romano Marco,Del Giudice Manlio,Nicotra Melita
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims at identifying factors that might affect academic patent activities. It investigates the characteristics of universities acting on the number of academic patents, thus classifying elements of differentiation among universities able to determine the level of patent activity.
Design/methodology/approach
– Three hypotheses are tested through a regression analysis, considering various academic variables.
Findings
– Results demonstrate that the patent activity is mainly influenced by the presence of universities’ internal policies that regulate such a field. The adoption of a regulation is a signal for academics of the university inclination and attempt to develop an environment conducive to patent activities, and to offer structured support to inventors in the different phases of the patenting process.
Research limitations
– The study, as it focuses on a single country, Italy, may reflect some peculiarities of the national system. Future research may extend it to different geographical areas in which institutional and environmental factors are different, or, maintaining the geographical location, study the impact of institutional factors to the change over time in the rate of patenting universities.
Originality/value
– Unlike the great number of studies which focus on institutional factors affecting university patent activity, the present study explores the academic elements able to valorize and exploit scientific knowledge, providing also a practical guidance for university governance.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management
Reference70 articles.
1. Allan, M.F.
(2001), “A review of best practices in university technology licensing offices”, The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 57-69.
2. Baldini, N.
,
Grimaldi, R.
and
Sobrero, M.
(2006), “Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: a study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002”, Research Policy, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 518-532.
3. Blackman, D.
and
Kennedy, M.
(2009), “Knowledge management and effective university governance”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 547-563.
4. Bonaccorsi, A.
(2003), Il sistema della ricerca pubblica in Italia, Franco Angeli, Milan.
5. Branscomb, L.
,
Kodama, F.
and
Florida, R.
(1999), Industrializing Knowledge, Sage, New York, NY.
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献