Author:
Mohamed Zulkifli,Kitani Mitsuki,Capi Genci
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of the robot arm motion generated by neural controllers in simulated and real robot experiments.
Design/methodology/approach
– The arm motion generation is formulated as an optimization problem. The neural controllers generate the robot arm motion in dynamic environments optimizing three different objective functions; minimum execution time, minimum distance and minimum acceleration. In addition, the robot motion generation in the presence of obstacles is also considered.
Findings
– The robot is able to adapt its arm motion generation based on the specific task, reaching the goal position in simulated and experimental tests. The same neural controller can be employed to generate the robot motion for a wide range of initial and goal positions.
Research limitations/implications
– The motion generated yield good results in both simulation and experimental environments.
Practical implications
– The robot motion is generated based on three different objective functions that are simultaneously optimized. Therefore, the humanoid robot can perform a wide range of tasks in real-life environments, by selecting the appropriate motion.
Originality/value
– A new method for adaptive arm motion generation of a mobile humanoid robot operating in dynamic human and industrial environments.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference20 articles.
1. Albers, A.
,
Brudniok, S.
,
Ottnad, J.
,
Sauter, C.
and
Sedchaicharn, K.
(2006), “Body of a new humanoid robot – the design of ARMAR III”, IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robot, pp. 308-313.
2. Capi, G.
(2007), “Multiobjective evolution of neural controllers and task complexity”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 1225-1234.
3. Capi, G.
,
Nasu, Y.
,
Mitobe, K.
and
Barolli, L.
(2002), “Autonomous humanoid robot locomotion based on neural networks”, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 252-258.
4. Coello, C.A.C.
(1998), “A comprehensive survey of evolutionary-based multiobjective optimization techniques”, Knowledge and Information Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 210-218.
5. Deb, K.
(2009), Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, Wiley, Chichester.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献