The use of performance information in strategic decision making in public organizations

Author:

Abdel-Maksoud Ahmed,Elbanna Said,Mahama Habib,Pollanen Raili

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the importance of different components of strategic performance measurement systems (SPMS) and their deployment influence the use of performance information from the SPMS in making strategic decisions. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected through a survey of 143 managers of Canadian public organizations. Findings – The findings indicate that two SPMS components, namely, the importance of non-financial performance measures and the use of operational efficiency measures, have significant positive associations with performance information use for strategy implementation and strategy assessment decisions. The extent to which SPMS models were used is found to be positively associated with performance information use for strategy implementation, but not for strategy assessment, decisions. Furthermore, the relationships between SPMS variables and strategic decision making are moderated by information systems/data limitations and management’s commitment to attaining strategic goals. Managerial skills acquired through training or experience with SPMS also contribute positively to such relationships. Research limitations/implications – The results are affected by limitations associated with the survey method used. Practical implications – The findings could be useful for supporting public policy, strategic decision making, public service improvement, operational efficiency, and effectiveness. Originality/value – The study contributes to public management and performance measurement literature by investigating multiple determinants of performance information use in a cross-section of Canadian public organizations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference54 articles.

1. Andrews, R. , Boyne, G.A. and Walker, R.M. (2006), “Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: an empirical investigation”, in Boyne, G.A. , Meier, K.J. , O ' Toole, L.J. Jr and Walker, R.M. (Eds), Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 14-34.

2. Bhimani, A. and Langfield-Smith, K. (2007), “Structure, formality and the importance of financial and non-financial information in strategy development and implementation”, Management Accounting Research , Vol. 18, pp. 3-31.

3. Birnberg, J.G. , Luft, J. and Shields, M.D. (2007), “Psychology theory in management accounting research”, in Chapman, C.S. , Hopwood, A.G. and Shields, M.D. (Eds), Handbook of Management Accounting Research , Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 113-136.

4. Bisbe, J. and Malagueno, R. (2012), “Using strategic performance measurement systems for strategy formulation: does it work in dynamic environments?”, Management Accounting Research , Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 296-311.

5. Bourne, M. , Melnyk, S.A. , Bititci, U. , Platts, K. and Andersen, B. (2014), “Emerging issues in performance measurement”, Management Accounting Research , Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 117-118.

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Strategic stances and organizational performance: Are strategic performance measurement systems the missing link?;Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration;2022-09-20

2. Public Financial Management in the European Union;Routlg Stud Pub Econ;2022-02-14

3. Introduction;Public Financial Management in the European Union;2022-02-14

4. Assessing audit outcomes of pre-determined objectives in a public institution (South Africa);International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management;2021-09-06

5. Revisiting the Miles and Snow typology of organizational strategy: uncovering interrelationships between strategic decision-making and public organizational performance;International Review of Public Administration;2021-04-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3