Administrator career paths and decision processes

Author:

Farley‐Ripple Elizabeth N.,Raffel Jeffrey A.,Christine Welch Jennie

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present qualitative evidence on the processes and forces that shape school administrator career paths.Design/methodology/approachAn embedded case study approach is used to understand more than 100 administrator career transitions within the Delaware education system. Semi‐structured interview data were collected from 48 principals and assistant principals. Coding and analysis occurred through an iterative process, revealing patterns in processes and forces influencing the careers of school administrators.FindingsWhile some career decisions are self‐initiated, most are influenced in part or entirely by other actors in the system, described as recruiting/tapping, requesting, reassigning, passing over, and removing. In self‐initiated decisions to move or stay, a number of “pushes” and “pulls” are identified. Findings also suggest the decision to stay‐equilibrium is driven by relationships with students and by district support.Research limitations/implicationsData are limited to Delaware and represent the voices of principals and assistant principals only. Patterns evident in the data suggest a need to further investigate administrator career behavior qualitatively, as well as directions for future research.Practical implicationsThere is a need to better understand and improve local human resource processes in terms of recruitment and assignment of administrators. Additional research is needed to better identify processes and forces related to career decisions in order to improve leadership recruitment and retention.Originality/valueThis research represents the first large‐scale qualitative study of administrator career behavior and is an important companion to recent quantitative analyses in this area.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Education

Reference91 articles.

1. Baker, B.D., Punswick, E. and Belt, C. (2010), “School leadership stability, principal moves, and departures: evidence from Missouri”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 523‐57.

2. Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

3. Barker, S.L. (1996), “Market trends in school administration: the case in Washington state”, available at: www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED401611.pdf (accessed September 14, 2009).

4. Barty, K., Thompson, P., Blackmore, J. and Sachs, J. (2005), “Unpacking the issues: researching the shortage of school principals in two states in Australia”, The Australian Educational Researcher, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 1‐18.

5. Begley, P. (2006), “Self‐knowledge, capacity and sensitivity: prerequisites to authentic leadership by school principals”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 44 No. 6, pp. 570‐89.

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3