Epistemological role of case studies in logistics

Author:

Aastrup Jesper,Halldórsson Árni

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop the paradigmatic justification for the use of case studies in logistics research. The argument is based on a critical realist (CR) ontology and epistemology. The current logistics paradigm's flat ontology – based on regularity – is replaced by an ontology emphasising structures and mechanisms underlying actual events in the form of logistics practice and performance.Design/methodology/approachThe approach takes the form of desk research, conceptual work and theorizing.FindingsBased on this CR view of the logistics domain it is argued that the justifications for conducting case studies lie in their ability: to reach the causal depth required for revealing the real domain of logistics activities and performance: to reveal the working of mechanisms in loosely coupled structures showing open systems characteristics through a constant alternation between abstract and concrete reasoning and; to include the causal powers and effects of agents' ascribed meanings. Also, it is argued, in contrast with Yin's work which refers to the possibility of generalising case studies, that the justification of case studies not only must refer to their complementary role in research but also must build on groundings that allow this form of research to take a primary role in knowledge creation.Practical implicationsThe arguments have direct implications primarily for the scientific justification for case studies in logistics. CR thinking in this respect offers a view in which case studies should be seen as a more legitimate method in logistics inquiries. Second, the paper has implications for further work on the methods of using case studies in logistics: between what types of case studies can one distinguish, and which practical guidelines regarding design and reasoning can be developed based on the CR view?Originality/valueThe paper problematizes current research methodology in logistics. Based on critical realism, it presents a thorough and systematic justification for using case studies as a research approach.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Transportation

Reference47 articles.

1. Archer, M. (1998), “Introduction – realism in the social sciences”, in Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (Eds), Critical Realism – Essential Readings, Routledge, London, pp. 189‐205.

2. Arlbjorn, J.S. and Halldorsson, A. (2002), “Logistics knowledge creation: reflections on content, processes and context”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 22‐40.

3. Bhaskar, R. (1975), A Realist Theory of Science, Leeds Books Ltd, Leeds.

4. Bhaskar, R. (1979), The Possibilities of Naturalism, Routledge, London.

5. Bhaskar, R. (1998), “General introduction”, in Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (Eds), Critical Realism – Essential Readings, Routledge, London, pp. 1‐15.

Cited by 85 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3