Minimizing supply chain disruption risk through enhanced flexibility

Author:

Skipper Joseph B.,Hanna Joe B.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the use of a strategic approach (contingency planning) to minimize risk exposure to a supply chain disruption. Specifically, the relationship between several attributes of a contingency planning process and flexibility are examined.Design/methodology/approachThis effort develops a model that will provide both researchers and practitioners a means of determining the attributes with the highest relationship to flexibility. The model is then tested using multiple regression techniques.FindingsBased on the sample used in this survey, top management support, resource alignment, information technology usage, and external collaboration provide the largest contributions to flexibility. Flexibility has been shown to enhance the ability to minimize risk exposure in the event of a supply chain disruption.Research limitations/implicationsIn this research effort, the multiple regression results produced an R2 of 0.45, indicating that additional variables of interest may need to be identified and investigated. Furthermore, a wider range of respondents could make the results more generalizable.Practical implicationsThis effort will help to allow managers at multiple levels to understand the primary planning attributes to use to increase flexibility.Originality/valueThe paper develops a model that can be used to identify the specific areas that can lead to improved flexibility. Based on the model, managers, and planners can develop appropriate strategies for minimizing risk exposure in the event of a supply chain disruption.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Transportation

Reference103 articles.

1. Andersen, T.J. (2000), “Strategic planning, autonomous actions and corporate performance”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 184‐200.

2. Andraski, J.C. (1998), “Leadership and the realization of supply chain collaboration”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 9‐11.

3. Ansoff, H.I., Avner, J., Brandenburg, R.G., Portner, F.E. and Radosevich, R. (1970), “Does planning pay? The effect of planning on success of acquisitions in American firms”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 2‐7.

4. Auramo, J., Kauremaa, J. and Tanskanen, K. (2005), “Benefits of it in supply chain management: an explorative study of progressive companies”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 35 No. 2, p. 82.

5. Bachmann, D.P., Elfrink, J. and Vazzana, G.E.‐M. (1999), “E‐mail and snail mail face off in rematch”, Marketing Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 10‐15.

Cited by 160 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Design and study of hybrid BI insurance contracts with interruption compensation, reward, and penalty under adverse selection;Managerial and Decision Economics;2024-07-30

2. Supply chain risk management and supply chain resilience under disruption risks: theoretical exploration;2024 IEEE 15th International Colloquium on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA);2024-05-02

3. Factors Affecting Supply Chain Integration in Omni-Channel Retailing;Sustainability;2024-04-19

4. The ambiguous impact of supplier involvement in product development on supplier relationship resilience and company performance;Central European Management Journal;2024-03-12

5. Vendor Management Practices and the Performance of Energy State Corporations in Kenya;International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (IJSSHR) ISSN 2959-7056 (o); 2959-7048 (p);2024-02-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3