Conceptual generalisation

Author:

Adriaenssen Daniel J.,Johannessen Jon-Arild

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to make a small contribution to reflections on general methodology, not specific methods, in social science. Design/methodology/approach – Systemic methodology. Findings – First, schematic typology of six conceptual models. Second, typology for determining levels of abstraction for different models and degrees of generalisation. Third, typology for generalisation on the basis of a case study. Fourth, strategy for developing conceptual models. Research limitations/implications – Research falls into two main categories: conceptual generalisation and empirical generalisation. Conceptual generalisation is an investigation whereby the researcher uses other researchers’ empirical findings in conjunction with his or her own process of conceptualisation in order to generalise and identify a pattern. This contrasts with empirical generalisation, where the researcher investigates a phenomenon or problem that is apparent in the empirical data, and only thereafter generalises in the light of his or her own findings. Practical implications – A low level of understanding of conceptual generalisation among masters and PhD students. With this paper the authors try to change this perception among students. Originality/value – Developing a systemic methodology in order for students and university teachers to understand conceptual generalisations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)

Reference93 articles.

1. Abercrombie, N. , Hill, S. and Turner, B. (1984), Dictionary of Sociology , Penguin, Harmondsworth.

2. Asplund, J. (1970), Om undran innfør samhället , Argos, Stockholm.

3. Asplund, J. (2010), Det Sociala Livets Elementära Former , Korpen, Stockholm.

4. Bailey, M.T. (1992), “Do physicists use case studies?”, Public Administration Review , Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 47-54.

5. Bateson, G. (1988), Ande och Natur , Symposion Bokförlag, Stockholm.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Party identification as a mediating variable in the perception of governmental legitimacy in Israel during the coronavirus epidemic;Social Science Quarterly;2024-08-04

2. Complexity reduction;A Systemic Approach to Continuous Change in the Innovation Economy;2022-02-24

3. Systemic thinking;A Systemic Approach to Continuous Change in the Innovation Economy;2022-02-24

4. The Soft Side of Knowledge Management in Health Institutions;EMERALD POINTS;2021-07-21

5. References;The Soft Side of Knowledge Management in Health Institutions;2021-07-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3