Author:
Zainudin Emie Famieza,Hashim Hafiza Aishah,Ismail Shahnaz
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the effect of the imposition of public reprimands on the underlying stock prices of companies in Malaysia.
Design/methodology/approach
Data on 148 companies that received public reprimands during the period from 2007 to 2013 were collected from the Bursa Malaysia website to analyse the market reactions to the imposition of public reprimands.
Findings
Based on a market model of abnormal returns, the empirical result showed that the imposition of a public reprimand had a negative impact on a company’s stock price. Moreover, when a market model of average abnormal returns (AAR) was used, the result indicated that companies that had received a public reprimand had a negative AAR value.
Research limitations/implications
The findings from this study have implications for shareholders in making their investment decisions because they can switch their investments to other companies and markets after a company in which they are interested or have made an investment has received a public reprimand.
Originality/value
There is limited research on the imposition of public reprimands and the effect that it has on companies in developing countries. Hence, this study contributes to research in this area by providing evidence on the effect of public reprimand on stock price reactions in the context of a developing country, namely, Malaysia.
Subject
Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference53 articles.
1. Accounting regulations, enforcement, and stock price crash risk: global evidence in the banking industry;Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics,2019
2. Ahlgren, N. and Antell, J. (2012), “Tests for abnormal returns under weak cross sectional dependence”, Working paper (2011), available at: www.hanken.fi/staff/ahlgren/blog/files/event113.pdf
3. Event studies and the law: Part II: empirical studies of corporate law;American Law and Economics Association,2002
4. The event study methodology since 1969;Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,1998
5. Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies;Journal of Financial Economics,1985