Author:
Pisano Giulia,Widanaralalage B. Kennath,Willmott Dominic
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to investigate the experiences of service providers supporting male victims and female perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV). The study explored the drivers, methods and treatments of female-perpetrated IPV, the nature and impact of abuse towards male victims, the barriers and facilitators to service provision and the impact on the practitioners themselves.
Design/methodology/approach
The study used a qualitative approach, using reflexive thematic analysis to analyse semi-structured interviews with 13 experienced service providers.
Findings
Two overarching themes were identified: systemic issues in service provision, including challenges with multi-agency approaches, funding and availability of services and the impact on practitioners; and gender stereotypes, which created barriers to male victims' help-seeking and influenced the treatment of female perpetrators.
Practical implications
The findings suggest the need for a multi-level approach, addressing gendered inequalities in IPV policy and funding, implementing gender-inclusive, evidence-based and trauma-informed practices, and raising public and professional awareness to challenge the dominant “domestic violence stereotype”.
Originality/value
This study provides a detailed, in-depth exploration of the experiences of service providers supporting “non-typical” populations in IPV, revealing the complex, multi-faceted challenges they face within a system that is inherently designed to support female victims of male perpetrators.
Reference99 articles.
1. How accurate and effective are screening tools and subsequent interventions for intimate partner violence in non-high-risk settings (IPV)? a rapid review;Journal of Criminal Psychology,2021
2. A marked man: female-perpetrated intimate partner abuse;International Journal of Men’s Health,2009
3. Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta analytic review of domestic violence treatment;Clinical Psychology Review,2004
4. Gender, risk assessment and coercive control: contradictions in terms?;The British Journal of Criminology,2021
5. Barton-Crosby, J. and Hudson, N. (2021), “Female perpetrators of intimate partner violence stakeholder engagement research”, available at: https://natcen.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-12/NatCen_Female-IPV-perpetrators-report.pdf