Author:
Malakooti Asl Nargess,Kaffashan Kakhki Mojtaba,Parirokh Mehri
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to investigate the relationship between customers’ knowledge management and their loyalty to academic libraries.
Design/methodology/approach
This study was conducted by the descriptive-survey method. After determining the validity and the reliability of the questionnaire, 400 questionnaires were distributed among the undergraduate students of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM) by stratified sampling method. Finally, 373 questionnaires were considered as the basis for data analysis. Structural equation method was used for data analysis.
Findings
In this study, nine hypotheses were examined and tested. The results of the path analysis indicated that factors such as perceived value, knowledge about customer, satisfaction, perceived quality, knowledge for customer and knowledge about customer had the most to least impact on customer loyalty to academic libraries. In addition, this study highlighted the role of perceived value. Data analysis showed the important role of perceived value as an interface between customers’ knowledge management and its direct and indirect relationship with them.
Practical implications
Based on the findings of this study, it seems that the managers and the librarians of academic libraries need to consider the relationship between customers’ knowledge management and perceived quality, as well as the satisfaction of their customers to use the customer knowledge management capacities for developing their loyalty.
Originality/value
In this case, an effective step can be taken toward developing the knowledge management of users and ultimately encouraging them to show their loyalty to academic libraries and satisfying their information needs and providing the justification for the survival of these types of libraries.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference62 articles.
1. User satisfaction with academic libraries services: academic staff and students perspectives;International Journal of Library and Information Science,2011
2. Communicating library value: the missing piece of the assessment puzzle;Journal of Academic Librarianship,2014
3. Library assessment research: a content comparison from three American library journals;Publications,2018
4. Explaining user satisfaction with academic libraries: strategic implications;College and Research Libraries,1998
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献