International mediation as a distinct form of conflict management

Author:

Vukovic Sinisa

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to provide a structured overview of the most important research conducted in the field of international mediation. Although there are still strong similarities between the processes of international and domestic mediation, lack of a clear structure on the international level suggests that international mediation activities could be separately academically scrutinized. This literature review is aimed at illustrating the unique nature of international mediation. Design/methodology/approach – Various factors that affect the overall process and the outcome of international mediation efforts were clustered in four distinct yet interrelated groups. The first section illustrates various mediators' characteristics that might induce the disputants to accept mediation and agree to specific terms that were mediated in the process. In the second section two distinct factors affecting the mediation outcome were explained: contextual and behavioral. Finally, in the third sections various types of mediators were discussed. Findings – The article shows the intricate complexities of international mediation, highlighting four distinct features that might have an effect on the mediation outcome: mediator's characteristics, contextual features, behavioral factors, and types of mediators. Originality/value – This article attempts to offer a comprehensive overview of the current state of the art in international mediation, and suggests potential areas of future research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Communication

Reference74 articles.

1. Assefa, H. (1987), Mediation of Civil Wars: Approaches and Strategies – The Sudan Conflict, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

2. Beber, B. (2012), “International mediation, selection effects, and the question of bias”, Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 397-424.

3. Beardsley, K. (2011), The Mediation Dilemma, Cornel University Press, Ithaca, NY.

4. Bercovitch, J. (1984), Social Conflicts and Third Parties, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

5. Bercovitch, J. (2002), Studies in International Mediation, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3