Women leaders' work-caused trauma: vulnerability, reflexivity and emotional challenges for the researcher

Author:

Mavin SharonORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis paper advances what is known about emotional experiences and challenges when researching work-caused trauma in organisations and illustrates learning for researchers of work-related trauma. Viewing vulnerability as strength could be conceived as an oxymoron. The paper explains how vulnerability can lead to strength for researchers/participants and focuses on researcher reflexivity in relation to one interview with a woman leader in a small-scale qualitative study.Design/methodology/approachThe research protocols of the qualitative study are outlined: pre-interview briefings, participant journaling and semi-structured interviews. Researcher reflexivity, following Hibbert's (2021) four levels of reflexive practice (embodied, emotional, rational and relational), is applied to an interview with a woman leader.FindingsThe paper illustrates how research design and recognising vulnerability as strength facilitates considerable relational work and emotional experiences. Researcher reflexivity conveys impact of work-caused trauma on participants and researchers. The paper advances understandings of vulnerability as strength in practice, emotional experiences and challenges of work-caused trauma research.Research limitations/implicationsIn this paper, a single case of researcher reflexivity is considered.Practical implicationsThere are practical implications for researcher relationships with participants; demonstrating emotional awareness; responding to traumatic stories, participant distress and impact on the researcher; issues of vicarious/secondary traumatic stress; having safe psychological systems; scaffolding a process which recognises vulnerability as strength and becoming personally and methodologically vulnerable; risk of embodied and emotional impact; commitment to reflexivity and levels of reflexive practice.Originality/valueThere is lack of researcher reflexive accounts of practice when studying trauma. Few scholars suggest ways to support researchers in challenging and difficult research. There is silence in research exploring leaders' experiences of work-caused trauma. This paper provides a reflexive account in practice from a unique study of women leaders' experiences of work-caused trauma.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference52 articles.

1. Alvesson, M. and Skőldberg, K. (2009), “Positivism, social constructionism, critical realism: three reference points in the philosophy of science”, Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, pp. 15-52.

2. Archer, M.S. (Ed.) (2009), Conversations about Reflexivity, Routledge, Oxon.

3. The anthropology of the body (No. 302.222 A5),1977

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. (Self-) Reflection / Reflexivity in Sensitive, Qualitative Research: A Scoping Review;International Journal of Qualitative Methods;2024-01

2. Guest editorial: Investigating trauma: methodological, emotional and ethical challenges for the qualitative researcher;Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal;2022-11-11

3. Feminist futures in gender-in-leadership research: self-reflexive approximations to intersectional situatedness;Gender in Management: An International Journal;2022-09-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3