Infrastructure as intermeditation – from archives to research infrastructures
Author:
Anderson Sheila,Blanke Tobias
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to analyse the steps taken to produce new kinds of integrated documentation on the Holocaust in the European Holocaust Research Infrastructure project. The authors present the user investigation methodology as well as the novel data design to support this complex field.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper is based on the scholarly primitives framework. From here, it proceeds with two empirical studies of Holocaust archival research and the implementation steps taken. The paper employs key insights from large technology studies in how to organise such work. In particular, it uses the concepts of social-technical assemblages and intermediation.
Findings
– The paper offers a number of findings. First from the empirical studies, it presents how Holocaust researchers and archivist perceive the way they currently do research in archives. It then presents how the intermediation and digital transformation of such research can be enabled without violating its foundations. The second major insight is the technical research into how to use graph databases to integrate heterogeneous research collections and the analysis opportunities behind.
Originality/value
– The paper is based on existing work by the authors but takes this work forward into the world of real-life existing historical research on archives. It demonstrates how the theoretical foundations of primitives are fit for purpose. The paper presents a completely new approach on how to (re)organise archives as research infrastructures and offers a flexible way of implementing this. Next to these major insights, a range of new solutions are presented how to arrange the socio-technical assemblages of research infrastructures.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference39 articles.
1. Anderson, I.G.
(2004), “Are you being served? Historians and the search for primary sources”,
Archivaria
, Vol. 58, pp. 81-129. 2. Anderson, S.
and
Blanke, T.
(2012), “Taking the long view: from e-science humanities to humanities digital ecosystems”,
Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung
, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 147-164. 3. Anderson, S.R.
and
Allen, R.B.
(2009), “Envisioning the archival commons”,
American Archivist
, Vol. 72 No. 1, pp. 383-400. 4. Bechhofer, S.
,
Buchan, I.
,
De Roure, D.
,
Missier, P.
,
Ainsworth, J.
,
Bhagat, J.
,
Couch, P.
,
Cruickshank, D.
,
Delderfield, M.
and
Dunlop, I.
(2013), “Why linked data is not enough for scientists”,
Future Generation Computer Systems
, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 599-611. 5. Blanke, T.
and
Hedges, M.
(2013), “Scholarly primitives: building institutional infrastructure for humanities e-Science”,
Future Generation Computer Systems
, Vol. 29, pp. 654-661.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|