The weight of organizational factors on heuristics

Author:

Barberà-Mariné M. Glòria,Cannavacciuolo LorellaORCID,Ippolito Adelaide,Ponsiglione Cristina,Zollo Giuseppe

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of organizational factors on individual decision-making under conditions of uncertainty and time pressure. A method to assess the impact of individual and organizational factors on individual decisions is proposed and experimented in the context of triage decision-making process. Design/methodology/approach The adopted methodology is based on the bias-variance decomposition formula. The method, usually applied to assess the predictive accuracy of heuristics, has been adjusted to discriminate between the impact of organizational and individual factors affecting heuristic processes. To test the methodology, 25 clinical scenarios have been designed and submitted, through simulations, to the triage nurses of two Spanish hospitals. Findings Nurses’ decisions are affected by organizational factors in certain task conditions, such as situations characterized by complete and coherent information. When relevant information is lacking and available information is not coherent, decision-makers base their assessments on their personal experience and gut feeling. Research limitations/implications Discriminating between the influence of organizational factors and individual ones is the starting point for a more in-depth understanding of how organization can guide the decision process. Using simulations of clinical scenarios in field research does not allow for capturing the influence of some contextual factors, such as the nurses’ stress levels, on individual decisions. This issue will be addressed in further research. Practical implications Bias and variance are useful measurements for detecting process improvement actions. A bias prevalence requires a re-design of organizational settings, whereas training would be preferred when variance prevails. Originality/value The main contribution of this work concerns the novel interpretation of bias and variance concepts to assess organizational factors’ influence on heuristic decision-making processes, taking into account the level of complexity of decision-related tasks.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference91 articles.

1. Untangling self-reinforcing processes in managerial decision making. Co-evolving heuristics?;Management Decision,2014

2. Too many to handle? Two types of multimarket contacts and entry decisions;Management Decision,2015

3. Collaboration dynamics in healthcare knowledge intensive processes: a state of the art on sociometric badges;Digital Technology and Organizational Change, Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation,2018

4. Arnott, D. (2002), “A taxonomy of decision biases”, Technical Report No. 2002/01, Decision Support Systems Laboratory, Monash University, Melbourne, available at: http://dsslab.sims.monash.edu.au/taxonomy.pdf (accessed October 25, 2017).

5. Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach;Information Systems Journal,2006

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3