New approaches to dealing with performance management: getting rid of performance appraisals is not the answer

Author:

Murphy KevinORCID,DeNisi Angelo

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to review the challenges of performance appraisal in organizations and argue that these challenges can and must be overcome.Design/methodology/approachThe authors review research on performance appraisal in organizations and on claims that organizations are abandoning performance appraisal.FindingsStructured performance appraisals are still the norm in organizations around the world. There are clear and practical strategies for improving appraisals. These include improving feedback and removing unnecessary complexity, clarifying the goals of appraisal systems, focusing appraisal on behaviors and outcomes under the employee's control and increasing the fairness of appraisal systems.Research limitations/implicationsResearch is needed on the effects of changing the ways performance appraisals are conducted in organizations.Practical implicationsPractical strategies for improving performance appraisal are outlined.Social implicationsBetter performance appraisals will benefit organizations and their members.Originality/valueThis paper refutes the growing claim that organizations are abandoning performance appraisal and illustrates practical strategies for improving performance appraisal.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference90 articles.

1. Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection;Academy of Management Review,1991

2. Management fashion;Academy of Management Review,1996

3. Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly;Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice,2016

4. Aguinis, H. (2009). An expanded view of performance management. In Smither, J. W., & London, M. (Eds.), Performance management: Putting research into practice (pp. 1–43). San Francisco: Wiley.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3