Collaborative governance difficulty and policy implication

Author:

Bang Min Seok,Kim YunYoung

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the case of the disaster involving the South Korean ferry, Sewol; offer policy implications; and point to the difficulty of collaboration in the functioning of the national disaster management system. Design/methodology/approach – The government network approach of this paper is adopted in order to study how to link different policy actors, how to deal with disaster issues in their networking, and how to produce social-political resilience. This paper explores why the national incident management system was not working properly in terms of “governance networking”, and focuses on changes that have been made to the legal system and the government organizational system since 2000. Findings – The principle results of the analysis are as follows: first, the collaboration between organizations that existed at the time of the accident focused only on sharing resources, and service delivery involved little connection between organizations. Second, assessment of the scale of the disaster was not carried out correctly because of dysfunctional relations between government network organizations and disaster victims, which affected both sides’ awareness of policy issues and priorities. Originality/value – This paper found that an integrated disaster management framework was not available, and activities were carried out for the sake of form. Also, no governance network for collaboration had been systematically built up, and there was also little collaboration between public and private organizations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health(social science)

Reference26 articles.

1. Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008), “Collaborative governance in theory and practice”, The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 543-571.

2. Bardach, E. (1998), Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftmanship , Brookings Institutions, Washington, DC.

3. Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2007), “The whole-of-Government Approach to public sector reform”, Public Administration Review , Vol. 67 No. 6, pp. 1059-1066.

4. Clary, B. (1985), “The evolution and structure of natural hazard policies”, Public Administration Review , Vol. 45, Special Issue, pp. 20-28.

5. Comfort, L.K. (1985), “Integrating organizational action in emergency management; trategies for change”, Public Administration Review , Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 10-32.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3