Author:
John Lijo,Narayanamurthy Gopalakrishnan
Abstract
Purpose
– Sustainability as a construct is still debated and is yet to attain a consensus among researchers and practitioners. Sustainable development has been seen differently by players from different industry sectors. There is need to understand the commonality prevailing on sustainability practices across different industry sectors to arrive at a consensual sustainability definition. The purpose of this paper is to propose four dimensions of sustainability and studies how it captures sustainability practices across key industrial sectors.
Design/methodology/approach
– Current study argues the case for sustainability using four constructs, namely, economical, environmental, ethical, and social. Subsequently a holistic definition with a model is proposed incorporating the four constructs for sustainability. Studies documenting sustainability practices across industries, namely, automobile, infrastructure, cement and concrete, electronics, mining, paper, pharmaceutical, and logistics were reviewed to validate the applicability of the proposed four construct model across different key industrial sectors.
Findings
– Current study validates the industry independence of the proposed four constructs of sustainability model through a literature review. Very few studies have documented industry-specific sustainability practices and much lesser have studied the ethical dimension of sustainability. Furthermore, the organizational strategic plan is developed for incorporating the environmental, economical, ethical, and social needs into the organizational business operations at the strategic, tactical, and the operational levels.
Research limitations/implications
– Proposed model needs to be applied in multiple case organizations from diverse sectors to evaluate its capacity to capture the aspects of sustainability across different sectors. Future study could attempt to understand the interrelationships between the identified constructs and how they impact each other within different industrial sectors.
Practical implications
– Model linked to organizational business operations at the strategic, tactical, and the operational levels helps in the alignment of the organizational activity towards the strategic intent of the organizational sustainability philosophy in the business ecology. It also helps in equipping the organization to achieve the operational excellence and the strategic business growth at the same time.
Originality/value
– Current study is unique in its attempt to understand the capability of proposed sustainability dimensions to capture the sustainability practices followed across different industrial sectors.
Reference106 articles.
1. Adenso-Diaz, B.
,
Gonzaleztorre, P.L.
and
Artiba, H.
(2004), “Environmental and reverse logistics policies in European bottling and packaging firms”,
European Journal of Operational Research
, Vol. 88 No. 2004, pp. 95-104.
2. Alfred, A.M.
and
Adam, R.F.
(2003), “Green management matters regardless”,
The Academy of Management Perspectives
, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 17-26.
3. Amankwah, R.K.
and
Anim-Sackey, C.
(2003), “Strategies for sustainable development of the small-scale gold and diamond mining industry of Ghana”,
Resources Policy
, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 131-138.
4. Angell, L.C.
and
Klassen, R.D.
(1999), “Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management”,
Journal of Operations Management
, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 575-598.
5. Aronsson, H.
and
Huge Brodin, M.
(2006), “The environmental impact of changing logistics structures”,
The International Journal of Logistics Management
, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 394-415.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献