Abstract
Purpose
Nowadays, in this highly dynamic and complex context, companies have to act in a socially responsible and sustainable way to survive, creating shared value. The purpose of this paper is to analyse, through descriptive statistics, the elements that Italian banks identify as strategic to increasing their relational and reputational capital and to being in consonance with stakeholder’s expectations.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper investigates the width (number of intermediaries that included the materiality matrix in their non-financial reports) and the depth (number of indicators in the matrix) of the phenomenon to detect the bank’s attention on critical topics for their stakeholders.
Findings
The focus is on materiality matrices in order to detect a correspondence among the significant indicators selected by the banks and those value generators for stakeholders. In the perspective used in this work, property is also a stakeholder; indeed, wanting to use the terminology of the viable systems approach, property represents a relevant supra-system as it is critical and influential for the decision makers.
Research limitations/implications
The main limits are the low number of non-financial reports published by Italian banks, and the little information on the type of stakeholder involved in the building of the materiality matrix.
Originality/value
The originality of this work is multifaceted. Primarily, there are no similar studies in the banking sector. The present work intends to go beyond the studies already in the literature on mapping and stakeholder prioritisation as well as on the identification and selection of material themes. Moreover, having found, during the analysis of the banks’ reports, the heterogeneity of indicators identified as material, for both banks and stakeholders, the same have been traced back to the related stages identified by Carroll in the pyramid of social responsibility.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference47 articles.
1. AccountAbility (2008), “AA1000 Accountability Principles Standard 2008”, available at: www.accountability.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/AA1000APS_english.pdf (accessed 24 May 2017).
2. Bhaduri, S.N. and Selarka, E. (2016), “Corporate social responsibility – guidelines and best practices”, Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility of Indian Companies, Springer, Singapore, pp. 33-42.
3. Materiality in accounting,1998
4. Azione etica e istituzionalizzazione morale nella visione situazionista dell’impresa. La strategia di Banca Popolare Etica;Sinergie Italian Journal of Management,2012
5. A feedback-based model for CSR assessment and materiality analysis;Accounting Forum,2015
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献