Author:
Hoyle Jeffrey,Deschaine Mark Edward
Abstract
Purpose
– Collegiate internships play an important role in the development of professionals. They provide students the opportunity to experience real world expectations embedded within actual vocational environments under the support of their collegiate faculty. Although there are a number of common reasons why internships are utilized in each academic area, the requirements for the experiences are substantially different across disciplines and level of coursework. The purpose of this paper is to explore some of the commonalities and differences that exist for internships across collegiate academic disciplines at both the undergraduate and graduate levels, and identify their salience for programs from an interdisciplinary perspective.
Design/methodology/approach
– For this conceptual piece, the authors took an introspective qualitative look at both programs and compared and contrasted them based on internally available documentation and information. Although this was theoretical in nature, the authors utilized materials available for certification and accreditation purposes for each of their programs. Multiple data sources were stakeholder interviews and conversations, site visits/observations, and site artifacts/documents.
Findings
– The authors found a great deal of both similarity and dissimilarity across programs, and these findings were utilized as grounds for programmatic introspection, evaluation, accreditation, and certification to better understand how stakeholder voice is involved in the processes. Table I provides an overview of items identified, and will serve as a guide for the remainder of this paper.
Originality/value
– An inclusive awareness will consider the voices of the student, university, employer, and other stakeholders, including co-workers and employers that currently do not offer internships. Given the rising cost of tuition and the wealth of competition in the market, the pressure is on for institutions of higher education to up the ante when it comes to providing quality experiential learning opportunities. The next step should focus on defining expectations and tailoring each internship program, and for that to be accomplished, all stakeholders must be “all in.”
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Education,Life-span and Life-course Studies
Reference70 articles.
1. Alpert, F.
,
Heaney, J.
and
Kuhn, K.
(2009), “Internships in marketing: goals, structures and assessment – student, company and academic perspectives”,
Australasian Marketing Journal
, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 36-45.
2. Arum, R.
and
Roksa, J.
(2011),
Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses
, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
3. Ashkanasy, N.
(2007), “Critiques of management education and scholarship and suggestions for change”,
Academy of Management Learning & Education
, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 102-103.
4. Astin, A.W.
(1975),
Preventing Students from Dropping Out
, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
5. Astin, A.W.
(1977),
Four Critical Years: Effects of College Beliefs, Attitudes, and Knowledge
, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献