Abstract
PurposeSlum discourse has attracted significant research interest among scholars. The study examined the policy framework for slum governance in Ghana with the goal of offering recommendations to structure slum management.Design/methodology/approachAnchored on exploratory qualitative methodology, the study utilized a purposive sampling technique to select 18 respondents from the major ministries for in-depth interviews.FindingsThe results showed an absence of a central national policy for slum governance because slums development has received less national priority. It also revealed a lack of coordination among the sector ministries in policy formulation, which tends to create a blame game among them. Further, it was found that slum programs are driven by media-political and non-governmental actors.Research limitations/implicationsThe conclusion and the outcome of this study cannot be generalized as to represent the whole ministries in Ghana in the space of slums management due to the qualitative approach. A recommendation is offered for the creation of a separate authority to take charge of the slums in Ghana.Practical implicationsThis study elucidates a context-specific understanding of the policy framework for slum governance, which tends to shape public knowledge and policy landscape.Originality/valueAs a novelty, the findings of the study advanced the sparse literature in the domain and, at the same time, helped politicians and policymakers understand the need for a dedicated policy for slums.
Reference38 articles.
1. Making cities resilient in Ghana: the realities of slum dwellers that confront the Accra metropolitan assembly;Journal of Sustainable Development,2021
2. Participatory incremental slum upgrading towards sustainability: an assessment of slum dwellers' willingness and ability to pay for utility services;Environment, Development and Sustainability,2018
3. Challenges Encountered in community development in urban slums: a study of Ashaiman, Ghana;International Journal of Science: Basic and Applied Research,2018
4. Incrementalism: dead yet flourishing;Public Administration Review,2015
5. Sample size for qualitative research;Qualitative Market Research,2016
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献