The use of librarians as occupational study populations in social science research

Author:

Still Julie,Wilkinson Zara

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address the use of librarians as a study population in social science research outside of the field of library and information science. Additionally, it aims to make general claims about how frequently librarians have been studied compared to other occupations, as well as to identify and describe existing research that has used librarians as a study population. Design/methodology/approach – The described study had two parts. Two social science databases were searched using the subject headings “librarians” and eight additional occupations, and the results for all nine occupations were analyzed. The peer-reviewed results for “librarians” were then coded by content. The articles that used librarians as a study population were identified, reviewed and described. Findings – Although librarians, as an occupational group, possess many characteristics that should make them an ideal choice for social science research, they seem to be studied less frequently than other occupations. Research limitations/implications – Other occupational groups, such as mathematicians, were also studied infrequently. Further research might consider, more broadly, why some occupations are studied more frequently than others. Future studies might also compare librarianship to other female-dominated professions, such as nursing and education. Additionally, the subject heading “librarians” was applied to articles that studied non-professional library employees, making it difficult to isolate only articles with a focus on degreed librarians. Originality/value – Few other studies have examined social science research in which librarians are used as the study population. By focusing on how librarians are studied and written about in other fields, this paper will add to the body of literature on the professional image of librarians.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference36 articles.

1. American Library Association (2011), ALA Demographics Studies , American Library Association, Chicago, IL, available at: www.ala.org/research/initiatives/membershipsurveys (accessed 10 July 2013).

2. American Library Association (2012), Diversity Counts, American Library Association, Chicago, IL , available at: www.ala.org/offices/diversity/diversitycounts/divcounts (accessed 10 July 2013).

3. Anasi, S. and Ali, H. (2012), “Resource sharing challenges and prospects in Nigerian university libraries”, Interlending and Document Supply , Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 156-162. doi: 10.1108/02641611211258235

4. Arant, , W. , Benefiel, and C.R. (Eds) (2003), Image and Role of the Librarian , Haworth Information Press, Binghamton, NY.

5. Balser, D.B. and Stern, R.N. (1999), “Resistance and cooperation: a response to conflict over job performance”, Human Relations , Vol. 52 No. 8, pp. 1029-1053. doi: 10.1023/A:1016931607916

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3