Author:
Hetherton Tony,Charlson Jennifer
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to examine the potential recovery of own party adjudication costs under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts Regulations 2013. The investigation directly applies to England and Wales, but may be relevant to other jurisdictions.
Design/methodology/approach
– The interaction between The Late Payment of Commercial Debts Regulations 2013 (derived from European Directive 2011/7/EU on combating late payment in commercial transactions) and the Local Democracy et al. 2009 including reference to case law was explored. A qualitative research framework was used to collect primary data through semi-structured interviews with experienced construction industry adjudication professionals.
Findings
– It was discovered that adjudicators are awarding own party costs under the Regulations, but there was disagreement on the issues in both the literature and amongst the interviewees.
Research limitations/implications
– A definitive judgment is awaited from the Technology and Construction Court.
Originality/value
– This paper will be of value to construction industry adjudication professionals.
Subject
Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Urban Studies
Reference41 articles.
1. Agapiou, A.
(2013), “UK construction participants experience of adjudication”,
Management and Procurement Law
, Vol. 166 No. MP3.
2. Atherton, M.
(2010), “Adjudication at the crossroads: the construction act – one size fits all?”,
Construction Law Journal
, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 242-346.
3. Babbie, E.
(1990),
Survey Research Methods
, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont.
4. Bell, J.
(1986), “Bennion’s ‘Statutory interpretation’”,
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 288-298.
5. Bridgeway Construction Ltd. v. Tolent Construction Ltd. [
2000] (TCC) CILL662.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献