Author:
Rey-Garcia Marta,Mato-Santiso Vanessa
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to understand the roles that social capital and real-world learning may play in enhancing the effects of university education for sustainable development (ESD) on social sustainability.
Design/methodology/approach
A conceptual framework that identifies the plausible effects of university ESD on social sustainability along three outcome dimensions (think-act-leverage), broadening desirable program learning outcomes and proposing enabling roles for social capital and real-world learning, is substantiated and validated through qualitative insights from a focus group. The framework serves to structure a survey to alumni of a postgraduate program in sustainability (2011–2018). Hierarchical clustering analysis is used to identify differences in perceived, sustainability-related effects of the program on direct beneficiaries and their relationship with stakeholders in their communities.
Findings
Implementation of real-world learning in partnership with organizations in the community that actively involves alumni not only extends desirable effects beyond individual program learning outcomes and outside the academia but may also renew them over time.
Practical implications
University administrators should foster the creation of new social capital of students and alumni and their commitment with service learning and other credit-bearing opportunities as actionable enablers to enhance the social sustainability effects of university ESD.
Originality/value
The paper contributes to a dual theoretical and empirical void related to the effects of university ESD on the social dimension of sustainability through the proposal of a conceptual framework and quantitative assessment of the dynamic effects of university ESD at the local level.
Subject
Education,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference42 articles.
1. Environmental and sustainability education policy research: a systematic review of methodological and thematic trends;Environmental Education Research,2016
2. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys;Journal of Marketing Research,1977
3. Bennett, C. and Papi, D. (2014), “From service learning to learning service”, working paper, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8 April.
4. Topic models,2009
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献