Author:
Vatansever Çigdem,Arun Korhan
Abstract
Purpose
– The dynamics of an emerging green entrepreneurship can be different in the emerging markets because the nature of the society and relations of business are different. As a result of these differences, green entrepreneurship also has distinguished dimensions and specific motivations. The purpose of this paper is to analyze individual cases of green entrepreneurs to understand local drivers and dynamics from the perspectives of ecological modernization and the network society theories.
Design/methodology/approach
– Qualitative methodology was followed in which the data were gathered via semi-structured interviews and a content analysis was executed to analyze the data.
Findings
– Time relativity, relatedness and altruism were found to be the most differentiated factors among other drivers for green entrepreneurs.
Originality/value
– The theories mentioned that the quality and quantity of entrepreneurs are not enough for the expected results; the society and networks of society also should push or pull. Nevertheless, to explain this, we may say Turkey has its own special dynamics. Heritage or own roots are very important and are observed for all participants. Also not legislation but practice of these legislations is another constraint in front of Turkish entrepreneurs.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference83 articles.
1. Alvarez, S.A.
(2005),
Theories of Entrepreneurship: Alternative Assumptions & the Study of Entrepreneurial Action
, Now Publishers, Boston.
2. Andersen, M.S.
and
Massa, I.
(2000), “Ecological modernization – origins, dilemmas and future directions”,
Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 337-345.
3. Anderson, A.R.
(1998), “Cultivating the garden of eden: environmental entrepreneuring”,
Journal of Organizational Change Management
, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 135-144.
4. Aponte, W.V.C.
(2013), “Non-governmental organizations
&
the sustainability of small and medium-sized enterprises in peru an analysis of networks and discourses”,
Environmental Policy Series – Volume 9
, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen.
5. Atsan, N.
(2008), “Metafor Analizi Yoluyla Girişimci Ve Girişimcilik Kavramlarının tanımlanması: Keşfedici Bir Çalışma”, 16 Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Istanbul.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献