Lean information management: the use of observational data in health care

Author:

Castle Andrew,Harvey Rachel

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast traditional data collection methodologies employed in health care with more practical observational methods which are closely aligned with Lean thinking. When combined with problem solving, observational approaches achieve demonstrable improvements in clinical outcomes, productivity and efficiency. The paper aims to describe the changes in mindset and behaviour that are required to adopt the observational methods.Design/methodology/approachThe approach is to describe and evaluate case study examples on the use of observational data in the National Health Service in the UK. This is then used to derive generic principles about the wider application of observational data in health care.FindingsTraditional data collection methodologies are often insufficient to expose the root cause of a problem and therefore may result in little or no action. The observational methods identify the root cause and as such offer a much more practical and real‐time way of solving process‐related problems.Practical implicationsThe observational methods of collecting data described here offer staff at all levels of the organisation practical approaches to preventing mistakes and errors in health care processes.Originality/valueThe case studies described here support the reintroduction of observational techniques used by the early pioneers of productivity. The originality of the paper is in the use of these observational methods in a wide range of clinical settings to provoke changes in working practices.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference12 articles.

1. Deming, W.E. (2000), Out of the Crisis, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

2. Donchin, Y., Gopher, D., Olin, M., Badihi, Y., Biesky, M., Sprung, C.L., Pizov, R. and Cotev, S. (2003), “A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit”, Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 143‐7.

3. Draper, S.W. (2008), “The Hawthorne, Pygmalion, Placebo and other effects of expectation: some notes”, available at: www.psy.gla.ac.uk/ ∼ steve/hawth.html#Hawthorne%20overall.

4. Gilbreth, F.B. and Carey, E.G. (2005), Cheaper by the Dozen, HarperCollins, New York, NY.

5. Greenberg, C., Diaz‐Flores, R., Lipsitz, S., Regenbogen, S., Mulholland, L., Mearn, F., Rao, S., Toidze, T. and Gawande, A. (2007), “A prospective study of the OR counting protocol”, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 205 No. 3, p. S73.

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. SÜREÇ İYİLEŞTİRME: HİZMET SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR UYGULAMA;Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi;2022-09-04

2. A BPMN-VSM based process analysis to improve the efficiency of multidisciplinary outpatient clinics;Production Planning & Control;2022-07-13

3. The Structural Framework Design on Information Management System of University Funding;Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing;2022-07-11

4. Development of Quality Information Management System for Alumina Ceramic Tube Manufacturing Process;Advances in Materials Science and Engineering;2022-03-11

5. College Counselor Information Management Platform Based on Web and Mobile Application;2021 International Conference on Aviation Safety and Information Technology;2021-12-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3