How good is the marketing method? Measuring the process and the outcomes

Author:

Pimenta da Gama António

Abstract

Purpose Marketing performance assessment has been a major concern and remains a vital issue for companies and professionals. This paper aims to revisit the theme of marketing audits and propose a methodological approach aimed to evaluate marketing practice at the light of the processes involved. Design/methodology/approach The paper is structured in three parts. It begins with an overview of marketing audit’s theoretical domain. Then, the rationale, content and implementation of the instrument are presented. Finally, the work’s main motivations and implications are discussed. Findings To turn assessment into a useful exercise, it is necessary the existence of a framework allowing a common language for describing marketing practice. The author believes that a structured approach for evaluating marketing processes can decisively influence marketing effectiveness. Research limitations/implications This work provided a theoretically anchored methodology for evaluating marketing practice. As such, it lays down the foundations for further research on the relevance of the selected processes and how they translate in future consequences for the business. Practical implications The view presented is intended to draw attention to the need for assessing the way marketing is executed, providing an instrument that helps professionals to better develop their activity and improve their contribution to business success. Originality/value Most existing marketing performance measures focus on outputs. However, results, per se, say little about the reasons of success or failure. This paper reinforces the importance of marketing audits as a tool to evaluate the way marketing processes are developed within an organization

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Management Information Systems

Reference15 articles.

1. Assessing marketing performance: reasons for metrics selection;Journal of Marketing Management,2004

2. American Marketing Association (2006), “Marketing accountability study white paper”, available at: www.dybvigconsulting.com/archive/pdf/2005AMAAprimoaccountability.pdf (accessed 18th July 2018).

3. Bhandari, R. Singer, M. and Van Der Scheer, H. (2014), “Using marketing analytics to drive superior growth”, Mckinsey Quarterly, June, available at: www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/our-insights/using-marketing-analytics-to-drive-superior-growth

4. A credibility gap for marketers;McKinsey Quarterly,2005

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3