Author:
Kjellsdotter Ivert Linea,Jonsson Patrik
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore how the context affects successful use of advanced planning and scheduling (APS) systems in sales and operations planning (S&OP) processes, and how individual, technological, and organizational (ITO) dimensions affect this procedure.
Design/methodology/approach
– This is a qualitative case study of two APS system-supported S&OP processes. The work aims to generate propositions concerning the relationships among the use of APS system, the context, ITO dimensions, and fulfillment of S&OP aims.
Findings
– Use of APS systems was especially appropriate in support of S&OP processes in complex planning environments and when S&OP aims were ambitious. ITO dimensions were important influences on successful APS system use in most contexts. APS systems were not considered appropriate when having S&OP processes with ambitious aims and low individual and organizational maturities. Use of APS systems was also inappropriate when the extent of technological maturity was minimal. S&OP processes with ambitious aims, operating within a complex planning environment, are difficult if not impossible to implement without the support of APS systems.
Practical implications
– The suggestions on when APS systems should be used in different S&OP environments will be useful to companies implementing or about to implement APS systems.
Originality/value
– APS systems offer great potential if they are effectively used to support S&OP, still the use of APS system in S&OP is unexplored. The paper shows how the context and the ITO dimensions affect the successful use of APS systems in S&OP processes.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference47 articles.
1. Affonso, R.
,
Marcotte, F.
and
Grabot, B.
(2008), “Sales and operations planning: the supply chain pillar,” Production Planning and Control, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 132-141.
2. APICS
(2010), Using Information Technology to Enable Supply Chain Management, APICS Certified Supply Chain Professional Learning System, APICS, Alexandria, VA.
3. Barratt, M.
,
Choi, T.Y.
and
Li, M.
(2011), “Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes and future research implications”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 329-342.
4. Berglund, M.
and
Karltun, J.
(2007), “Human, technological and organizational aspects influencing the production scheduling process”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 110 Nos 1/2, pp. 160-174.
5. Bower, P.
(2006), “How the S&OP process creates value in the supply chain,” Journal of Business Forecasting, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 20-29.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献