Author:
Ha‐Brookshire Jung E.,Norum Pamela S.
Abstract
PurposeThis study seeks to investigate significant factors influencing consumers' willingness to pay a premium for three different socially responsible products – organic cotton, sustainable cotton, and US‐grown cotton shirts.Design/methodology/approachThrough random‐digit‐dialing, the study data were collected from 500 respondents nationally via telephone surveys. The survey data were analyzed using stepwise regression and mean comparisons.FindingsMore than half of the respondents indicated that they were willing to pay a premium for organic, sustainable, and US‐grown cotton shirts ($5.00 or more for these cotton shirts at the $30.00 retail value). Consumer attitudes toward socially responsible apparel, attitudes toward environment, age, and gender were found to be significant factors for consumers' willingness to pay a premium. Four apparel product evaluative criteria, brand name, laundering requirements, color, and fit, were also found to be important for consumers' willingness to pay a premium.Research limitations/implicationsGeneralization from the study findings must be assumed with care due to the telephone survey mode.Practical implicationsApparel businesses planning to offer organic, sustainable, or US‐grown cotton apparel products may want to emphasize certain tangible benefits, such as strong brand, reasonable price, easy care, color, and fit, concurrently with intangible benefits, such as feeling good by helping society and environment.Originality/valueThe findings showed relationships among attitudes, product evaluative criteria, demographic characteristics, and willingness to pay a premium for three different options of socially responsible cotton apparel, in order to help close the gap between attitudes and behavior in consumer research.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference27 articles.
1. Anderson, C.G. (2009), “Cotton market comments: little change expected in cotton market”, available at: www.cottoninc.com/CottonMarketComments/Little‐Change‐Expected‐in‐Cotton‐Market/ (accessed 5 March 2010).
2. Bannister, J.P. and Saunders, J.A. (1978), “UK consumers' attitudes towards imports: the measurement of national stereotype image”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 12 No. 8, pp. 562‐70.
3. Boulstridge, E. and Carrigan, M. (2000), “Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude‐behavior gap”, Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 355‐68.
4. Bruwer, J. and Johnson, R. (2010), “Place‐based marketing and regional branding strategy perspectives in the California wine industry”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 5‐16.
5. Carrigan, M. and Attalla, A. (2001), “The myth of the ethical consumer: do ethics matter in purchase behavior?”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 560‐77.
Cited by
120 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献