Author:
Jansson Johan,Marell Agneta,Nordlund Annika
Abstract
PurposeKnowledge of green consumer behavior is important for environmental and business reasons. The purpose of this study is to examine the determinants of green curtailment behaviors and consumer adoption of innovations marketed as green (eco‐innovations), and to analyze factors explaining these two types of green behaviors.Design/methodology/approachThe results from a survey on adopters and non‐adopters (n=1,832) of alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) are reported. Regression analysis on willingness to curtail car use and willingness to adopt a so‐called environmentally friendly car are used to identify significant determinants across the behavioral categories.FindingsThe results show that values, beliefs, norms, and habit strength determine willingness to curtail and willingness for eco‐innovation adoption. Personal norms have a strong positive influence on willingness for the behaviors and habit strength has a negative influence. The other determinants have varying influence depending on type of behavior.Research limitations/implicationsA limitation of this study concerns the focus on only one eco‐innovation. However, since the adoption of AFVs is a high involvement behavior, the results carry implications for other high involvement products as well.Practical implicationsAttitudinal factors and habits in combination prove to be effective determinants for curtailment behaviors and willingness to adopt eco‐innovations. In addition, previous adoption is found to be a strong determinant of future willingness to adopt.Originality/valueThe contribution of the paper is the two‐sided approach on green consumer behavior and the result that values, beliefs and norms not only predict low involvement post‐purchase behaviors but also adoption of high involvement eco‐innovations.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference69 articles.
1. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1977), “Attitude‐behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 84 No. 5, pp. 888‐918.
2. Alwitt, L.F. and Berger, I.E. (1993), “Understanding the link between environmental attitudes and consumer product usage: measuring the moderating role of attitude strength”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 189‐94.
3. Bamberg, S. and Schmidt, P. (2003), “Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students' car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis”, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 264‐85.
4. Barr, S. (2007), “Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management”, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 435‐73.
5. Beise, M. and Rennings, K. (2005), “Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 5‐17.
Cited by
383 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献