Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate an innovative collaboration between health, housing and social care by exploring the “short stay project” apartments from service users’ perspectives and considering the effectiveness of this service model as part of enabling provision locally.
Design/methodology/approach
The qualitative methodology for this evaluation was interpretative phenomenological analysis (Smith, 2011), critically exploring service users’ personal lived experience of the “short stay project”. Three service users (n=3) participated in semi-structured interviews.
Findings
This study has identified the “short stay project” can prevent admission into and facilitate discharge from care and health services by offering a temporary stay in self-contained, adapted accommodation. Service users found value in staying at the apartments for differing reasons. However, practitioners must address service users’ emotional and social needs as well as physical needs to reduce the risk of occupational deprivation.
Research limitations/implications
Sample size is not fully representative of the total population making transferability limited.
Practical implications
This research found there is demand for temporary housing provision for service users with health, housing and/or social care needs.
Social implications
Key drivers of demand for the service are social inequalities relating to homelessness, poverty and gender-based violence rather than the health-related issues that could have been expected. Further research into the development of effective integrated services which maximise service users’ wellbeing and occupational performance is recommended.
Originality/value
Service models which integrate health, housing and social care can be innovative and maintain service users’ independence and wellbeing in the community. Commissioners across health, housing and social care could utilise the Better Care Fund to deliver integrated services to meet rising demands.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference63 articles.
1. Three different outcomes in older community-dwelling patients receiving intermediate care in nursing home after acute hospitalization;The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging,2016
2. Improving housing, improving health: the need for collaborative working;British Journal of Community Nursing,2006
3. Barnes, M., Cullinane, C., Scott, S. and Silvester, H. (2013), “People living in bad housing: numbers and health impacts”, available at: http://england.shelter.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/726166/People_living_in_bad_housing.pdf (accessed 8 July 2016).
4. The effectiveness of local authority social services’ occupational therapy for older people in Great Britain: a critical literature review;British Journal of Occupational Therapy,2013
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献